HardinBernhardtRanks

National Quiz and History Bowl Rankings

View project on GitHub

Hardin-Bernhardt Ranks

Hardin-Bernhardt Ranks is a new way of ranking Quiz Bowl and History Bowl teams using a modified version of the Glicko-2 Elo formula that takes into account strength of field and margin of victory.

The Formulas

Adjusted Score Formula

This formula, based on the similar FiveThirtyEight formula for NFL teams, attempts to calculate an adjustment to the rating calculation given by the glicko-2 formula on the basis of margin of victory and relative pregame rating.

\[MovMod = (0.5+{{ln(1+{S_A\over S_A+S_B})}\over 5})({2.2\over0.001(R_A-R_B)+2.2})\]

Expected Score Formula

This formula uses the Elo ratings (R) of a given lower-rated Team A and higher-rated Team B to calculate what percentage of the total points Team A would be expected to score in a game against Team B. This formula will always result in a value for the expected score of A (SE(A)) between 0 and 1.

\[S_E(A) = {1\over e^{(R_B-R_A)/400}+1}\] SE(A) = expected score of A
RB = current rating of B
RA = current rating of A

New Rating Formula

Following a game between Team A and Team B, this formula calculates the new Elo rating of Team A. The new rating formula takes the percentage of the game’s points scored by Team A, multiplies it by T to adjust for conversion issues, and compares it to the expected score for A (SE(A)). That result is then multiplied by the variables q and K to adjust for strength of field, and games played respectively.

\[R_n(A) = {R_o(A)+K[({qS_A\over S_A+S_B})-S_E(A)]}\] Rn = new rating
Ro = old rating
q = strength of field value
S = score
SE(A) = expected score of A
K = game weight value

The Variables

q-Value

The q-value is used to represent strength of field at a tournament and intended to help improve elo as a measure of skill unaffected by the field a team is up against, and thus more useful and accurate as a comparison between teams from different regions. It is calculated as a ratio of average total points scored per game at a given tournament : average total points scored per game on a given set, and is calculated independently for the Varsity and JV fields.

\[q = {cPPG_T\over cPPG_S}\] cPPGT = combined points per game overall all games played at the tournament
cPPGT = combined points per game over all games played on the set

K-Value

The K-value is a multiplier to adjust for the different formats of tournaments which lead some teams to play more or fewer games, as well as to account for the uncertainty inherent in early games before rankings are more finalized. It is set equal to 800 over the number of games played by the team (not counting byes or crossover matches), multiplied by the square root of the current number game.

\[K = {\sqrt G_C{800\over G_T}}\] GC = current games played
GT = total games played by the team

Varsity C-Set Rankings (2021)

Ranking Team State Score
1 Montgomery Blair A Maryland 1514.042
2 Hunter A New York 1496.982
3 Lambert Georgia 1455.941
4 Newton North A Massachusetts 1424.365
5 Stevenson A Illinois 1400.510
6 Hotchkiss A Connecticut 1395.248
7 Ransom Everglades A Florida 1392.356
8 Holmdel New Jersey 1389.857
9 Northfield A Minnesota 1388.321
10 Lindsey Homeschool Missouri 1365.450
11 James Clemens Alabama 1362.185
12 Newton North B Massachusetts 1324.423
13 Hoover Alabama 1320.822
14 Ridgewood A New Jersey 1316.170
15 Georgetown Day DC 1304.895

Junior Varsity C-Set Rankings

Ranking Team State Score
1 Detroit Country Day Michigan 1790.302
2 Hunter B New York 1646.792
4 East Brunswick New Jersey 1629.067
4 Stevenson C Illinois 1619.109
5 Wilton K Connecticut 1542.966
6 Ransom Everglades B Florida 1357.295
7 Buchholz A Florida 1354.483
8 Centennial B Maryland 1277.657
9 Montgomery Blair B Maryland 1267.114
10 Ransom Everglades C Florida 1255.143
11 Centennial B Maryland 1253.450
12 Millburn B New Jersey 1225.620
13 IMSA Illinois 1218.257
14 Stevenson D Illinois 1213.482
15 Amador Valley B California 1206.147

*Note: Due to allegations of cheating, certain teams have been excluded from these rankings pending further investigation.

Tournaments

Tournament Set Varsity q-Value JV q-Value
Southeast Fall C 0.972 0.969
West Fall C 0.999 0.965
Midwest Fall C 1.011 1.109
Northeast Fall C 1.011 1.006